RESUMO
El derecho español, artículo 177 del Código Civil, y el Convenio Europeo de adopción de menores requieren para la validez del consentimiento de la madre el transcurso, tras el parto, de seis semanas, en garantía de su libertad, consciencia y adecuada información. En contraste en los contratos de vientres de alquiler la mujer contratada en la gestación debe dar su consentimiento irrevocable de entrega del niño al nacer, ex ante del proceso, desprotegiéndola: impidiendo la revocación de su (aparente) voluntad inicial al concluir la gestación y conocer a su hijo ya nacido. Además de la ilicitud del objeto de este contrato, pese a la existencia de derecho que lo positivice, debe considerarse el consentimiento prestado nulo de pleno derecho
Spanish law, article 177 of the Civil Code, and the European Convention on the minors adoption require for the validity of the mother ́s consent, the passing of six weeks after the birth, as a guarantee of her freedom, consciousness and adequate information. In contrast, in the agreements of surrogate mother, the woman contracted for the pregnancy must give her irrevocable consent to give the child at birth, ex ante the process, leaving her unprotected: preventing the revocation of her (apparent) initial choice at the end of the pregnancy and knowing her child already born. In addition to the illegality of the object of this contract, despite the existence of a law that makes it positive, the consent given must be considered null and void
Assuntos
Humanos , Mães Substitutas/legislação & jurisprudência , Adoção/legislação & jurisprudência , Regulamentação Governamental , Pessoalidade , Contratos/legislação & jurisprudência , Confidencialidade/ética , Confidencialidade/legislação & jurisprudência , Responsabilidade ContratualRESUMO
Spanish law, article 177 of the Civil Code, and the European Convention on the minors' adoption require for the validity of the mother's consent, the passing of six weeks after the birth, as a guarantee of her freedom, consciousness and adequate information. In contrast, in the agreements of surrogate mother, the woman contracted for the pregnancy must give her irrevocable consent to give the child at birth, ex ante the process, leaving her unprotected: preventing the revocation of her (apparent) initial choice at the end of the pregnancy and knowing her child already born. In addition to the illegality of the object of this contract, despite the existence of a law that makes it positive, the consent given must be considered null and void.
